>>>Seen from laws requiring ID including machine readable photo plus 2 finger prints R argument is hard to disprove.
>
>Hopefully our US brethren note that in Free World Germany you need a machine-readable photo ID and finger prints to vote.
>
>If they can't solve this, it's because they don't want to.
>
>>>So why not add picture and further ID data to voter registration process to eliminate or at least diminish doubt on next elections ? Having a separate database of voters without regular checks on survival or still living at that address smells bad - as already written, without further info on the additional checks and balances the US system seems to invite error more than habits over here.
>
>Some would say that these sentiments make you a Republican and therefore a racist violent insurrectionist. Shame on you. ;-)
>
>>>Do not discount the physical - I do remember your medical "interest", but here I am more talking about things with inertia
>
>People have committed suicide after online billy-clubbings. The physical billy club is something rarely faced by educated people these days, but the online billy club is forever poised and terrible to behold.
>
>>>I still fail to see even middle range plan:
>>>Trump declaring martial law because a couple of D and few R senators and delegates are unable to verify Electoral >>College certificates due to long neck trouble and eliminating the rest with Army/National Guard?
>>>Trump staying prez because Electoral College certificates were burned ?
>>>Creating a hostage situation with captured delegates ?
>>>Verifying the certification process with knives near delegational jugulars ?
>
>US politics: people trumpet the worst interpretations against each other and then act aghast at the worst imaginable responses and motives of which they can accuse each other. We simply have no idea what the plan was, if there even was one.
>
I agree. Hell, many of the "most outraged" need a few lessons in history, They don't know what a real riot looks like.
At 5:40 p.m., a determined crowd of 35,000 headed for the Pentagon. A smaller segment at the front stormed forward, scaled the walls, and forced their way into the Pentagon. The Deputies and soldiers were taunted and assaulted with vegetables, rocks, and bottles. The troops inside the Pentagon rushed outside as the violence escalated. A full-scale riot erupted.
Hidden inside the Pentagon and other government buildings were five to six thousand Army troops armed with rifles and bayonets.
October 21, 1967 https://www.usmarshals.gov/history/civilian/1967a.htm
And, this was a demonstration for peace.



>>>Why storm the Hill if you cannot hold it ? OTOH seeing some of the 43 Rs pretzeling to explain their vote is also something hard to swallow. Only shows that I am not built to enter politics...
>
>See if you can find law professor Turley's opinions- e.g. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/science/trumps-capitol-speech-does-not-meet-standards-of-criminal-incitement-turley/vi-BB1dG4MP . He is past the point of caring about the online billy club so perhaps more credible than others...