>>>It is not a great stretch to realize not to hard-code names into an app, but when people think programming is art instead of engineering, they will not engineer a simple thing like this instead of a primitive hard-coding of names.
>>
>>What happened to the science? So now you say that programming is engineering? What is it mike?
>>
>>I'm sure in your blind rage you did not deepen yourself into the matter, so here a few links for you
>>
>>https://www.parkersoftware.com/blog/is-programming-art/
>>https://towardsdatascience.com/programming-is-art-2d2c66fb0f96
>>https://ruben.verborgh.org/blog/2013/02/21/programming-is-an-art/
>>https://spin.atomicobject.com/2012/06/12/computer-programming-is-still-an-art/
>>
>>If you think this a relatively new viewing angle on the subject.. nope as the following article goes back to 1974
>>http://paulgraham.com/knuth.html
>
>
>All you say is bullshit. Your hero says it must be elevated to a science.

No he doesn't. He speaks off elevating the art by accepting scientific principles, not turning it into science.
You did not read the link. especially the part why he says his book is called "The Art of Computer Programming"

So tell me why he called it that way ???

Stop the BS mike.