>Minor correction correction...
>Christof didn't say that Slowstart was a patch. He was saying that they only >published the Slowstart info because the other "better" solution *is* a patch. >The Slowstart folks also recommend the "other" patch solution.

Hmmmmm. Okay, this is relevant sentence:

"There's a patch out there that fixes the Division >by zero error on machine with 400 Mhz and more."

If I am not mistaken, the word patch is indeed there. The slowstart solution is the one that fixes the divide by zero error. Enough said.

First off, there is no issue between Christof and myself and as such - there is no need for you to be a peacemaker here... < s >