>>Minor correction correction...
>>Christof didn't say that Slowstart was a patch. He was saying that they only >published the Slowstart info because the other "better" solution *is* a patch. >The Slowstart folks also recommend the "other" patch solution.
>
>Hmmmmm. Okay, this is relevant sentence:
>
>"There's a patch out there that fixes the Division >by zero error on machine with 400 Mhz and more."
>
>If I am not mistaken, the word patch is indeed there. The slowstart solution is the one that fixes the divide by zero error. Enough said.
>
>First off, there is no issue between Christof and myself and as such - there is no need for you to be a peacemaker here... < s >

You still misread.