>>>>>That must be nice. :) Unfortunately, only one of my users has an internet connection, so I can't go through that way. Luckily I don't have to do much online support anymore. My coworker is the one doing most version 5 support, and we haven't released 6 yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>-Michelle
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>There are some other issues. With anothe 56K modem, the fastest I have connected at was around 52 - and the performance was fine.... Usually, I use IP addresss and connect through a T1 - which is real nice .. < bg > :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The clients only have 33.6. Never connected at 33.6, though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Won't they upgrade??? I think we are talking roughly $100.00/$150.00 here...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>< JVP >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't know. I never asked. I'm pretty sure on of the clients has 56k, and I don't connect any faster there, so I didn't think it would make a difference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-Michelle
>>>>
>>>>I've used pcANYWHERE and conected with clients at 28.8K, and don't see any really bad performance. The only odd thing is that menu pull-downs seem to refresh horizontally (drawing one pixel column at a time) very slowly instead of vertically (top down) like everything else seems to do, which is pretty acceptable as far as speed goes. Faster is definitely better, though.
>>>
>>>I wonder why I'm having so much trouble. It seems to take forever to do anything.
>>>
>>>-Michelle
>>
>>Which version of pcANYWHERE are you using? 7.5, well, wasn't so hot, but 8.0's been great!
>
>
>I'm using 8.
>
>-Michelle
Well, pcANYWHERE has certainly never been as slow to use as UT sometimes is, but it's OK for me. I think I figured out why the menu's refresh horizontally. On W98, thats the way they are drawn, from left to right.