Luis,
I could be wrong, but I don't see how you can hope to have the record pointer *not* move during a table update. Before you issue your table update, you could store the record number of the record pointer and then reset the pointer when you're done.
>Hello everybody,
>When you are using table buffering, that is, buffering=5 or
>buffering =3, after updating several records and doing a
>TableUpdate(.t.), the cursor is moved to the last record
>mdified, I want the cursor to stay where it is without hav
>having to doit manually.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only