SNIP

That's good Craig (really)

Now let's see some things for the *real* "average VFP user" - you know, those who will not (vast majority) make DEVCON or FoxTeach or ????.

A damned good start would be an accessible list of Wishes Submitted, Wishes Acknowledged (but not yet 'judged'), Wishes Disregarded, Wishes Still to be *possibly* included and wishes being included in some future release (though still subject disregard if circumstances warrant) .>

Another thing would be more details of what actually got into a SP and some additional background to permit maximum exploitation. For instance, it was observed (and later acknowledged by Mr. Brown of MS) that (re)INDEX had been 'improved'. It would be nice to learn that "officially" as well as to learn under just what circumstances the improvement(s) take effect.
[ and I must say that this may be in the SP docs - I'm awaiting my CD].

Another thing would be an accessible list of DOCUMENTATION errors/omissions/clarifications. . .
1) acknowledged;
2) known;
3) being incorporated into NEXT update or product.

These are some examples of things they *COULD* be doing.

Cheers

Jim N



>This past February Robert Green spoke at my user group. He did not have a specific topic, but instead asked "What are we doing wrong and what can we do to improve it?" I was the only MVP there. I've seen some of those things alredy implemented. Many of the changes at DevCon this year, such as more speakers, more intro type sessions is a direct result of input from last year. This sure looks to me like people are listening to the average VFP user.