>It's not for the faint of heart, that's for sure! :) The more people who participate, the better the information will be. It's really not much different than the self-correcting dynamic in newsgroups.
Having more people on something doesn't mean better quality! :)
>Partly, too...we'll see. So, far I see no reason at to NOT try it.
That's for sure.
>...and I won't even go into my emerging theories that this is at last the *spur* for computers becoming truly a tool of art...much like the break through in the early 20th c. when photography kept thinking it was....oh. Okay. Sorry, off-topic, huh? :)
Is/was art ever a public work?
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only