>>>When we are replying, it is prefixed with '>' to indicate that it is Old text...
>>>
>>>Apart from that if the original message is :-
>>>
>>>1. Prefixed with '>' (which it is already doing)
>>>2. Bold = .f.
>>>3. Italics = .t.
>>>4. Color=Different than black (green/grey/blue )
>>>
>>>& Replied message
>>>
>>>1. Bold = .t. (which is already there)
>>>
>>>This will give a visual clue to user what was the new text added & don't have to read/search the full message....
>>I don't think majority would like this.
>>Cetin
>
>yes this is exactly i was saying... Just try to see this msg (I'm not talking abt. the beautification part) but within a glance you can come to know which text you have added....
>
>The replied version which i suggested i.e. italics=.t. & bold=.f. etc. can be provided as changeable from account configuration...
>
>Based on that, users can select the formatting option of both original message and replied text...
>
>Pls advs. your comments...

---

Yes Vinod,
I understand what you're saying. But already we have a good interface here. West-wind interface is the other which I really like. Michel doesn't let many tags to be used but at least we could do it ourselves with a small set :) Before you could use font tag as I remember and IMHO if Michel doesn't want it to be used there is something he knows (and he sure knows web interface much much much more than me).
I find it sufficient to use an extra "enter" or horizontal line if dispersing between current lines.
Cetin