>>>>When we are replying, it is prefixed with '>' to indicate that it is Old text...
>>>>
>>>>Apart from that if the original message is :-
>>>>
>>>>1. Prefixed with '>' (which it is already doing)
>>>>2. Bold = .f.
>>>>3. Italics = .t.
>>>>4. Color=Different than black (green/grey/blue )
>>>>
>>>>& Replied message
>>>>
>>>>1. Bold = .t. (which is already there)
>>>>
>>>>This will give a visual clue to user what was the new text added & don't have to read/search the full message....
>>>I don't think majority would like this.
>>>Cetin
>>
>>yes this is exactly i was saying... Just try to see this msg (I'm not talking abt. the beautification part) but within a glance you can come to know which text you have added....
>>
>>The replied version which i suggested i.e. italics=.t. & bold=.f. etc. can be provided as changeable from account configuration...
>>
>>Based on that, users can select the formatting option of both original message and replied text...
>>
>>Pls advs. your comments...
>

---

Yes Vinod,
>I understand what you're saying. But already we have a good interface here. West-wind interface is the other which I really like. Michel doesn't let many tags to be used but at least we could do it ourselves with a small set :) Before you could use font tag as I remember and IMHO if Michel doesn't want it to be used there is something he knows (and he sure knows web interface much much much more than me).
>I find it sufficient to use an extra "enter" or horizontal line if dispersing between current lines.
>Cetin

yes, I can understand that...

Infact i don't know much abt. these tags i.e. why wrote the whole thing explaining it.. (This same thing i'm using in my emails while i'm giving reply)

For UT, Currently i'm using the extra space between lines...

Anyway let him see this himself & decide...