>>>>Steven Black - has added or will add this functionality to his msg board. There are times when threads degenerate to personal attacks.
>>>>
>>>>Dan
>>>
>>>IMHO, this is what moderation is for. Several Sysops should be entrusted with the power to kill a thread that gets out of hand.
>>>
>>>If it comes to voting, the criteria for a killworthy thread could spread to whatever people don't like to read, and I think this is unnecessary censorship.
>>
>>That's a good point. I suppose that Michele or one of his people could use a final veto, if they felt that those voting were being unreasonable. I'm curious is anyone monitoring these threads or are they relying on one of us to send them an E-mail or a private message when one of the threads is getting out of hand.
>>
>
>
>There are several Sysops assigned to monitoring the threads, but they can't be present all of the time. The times when a thread needs to be killed (ad hominem attacks, illegal proposals etc.) are relatively few and far between. I would suggest that if we see killworthy threads getting by these watchful eyes, UT should maybe appoint a few more sysops (possibly from other time zones).
That's definitely a reasonable alternative.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only