>>Hi Stephen,
>>
>>Just for your edification, some new "facts" (in quotes because I have a suspicion - not really widely shared, I'll admit, that it is really a **change** in Rushmore behaviour) about a TAG on DELETED() is that, *most* of the time such a TAG will hurt rather than help **IF** SET DELETED is ON.
>>
>>If this was done 'by design' by the MS team in the relatively recent past, then we deserve to have been told about it. If it is a 'mistake' in VFP, then it ought to be corrected ASAP.
>>
>>regards,
>>
>>Jim N
>>
>Thanks for the heads up on that one!
>
>I've been using the deleted() tag for 9 or 10 years. And set deleted on for as long as FP has been out.
>
>Old habits die hard!
>
>Thanks.

Also, if you're using Web Connect, I believe Rick is actually looking for the deleted tags in his classes. At least, I think I remember him saying that. I use the sys(3054,1) function to check for Rushmore optimization anyway.