>
>This brings to mind another thread going on now. The one on DevDays. If I recall correctly, a similar one popped here last year. I believe that it was John Petersen who pointed out that the reason that there's no mention of VFP there is that in previous years when VFP was mentioned there was little or no response. That fits in with my "bang for the buck" point.

That was the TechEd thread. VFP was well represented last year at DevDays.

>>>
>>Yes, I was on that case study too. Unfortunately, I got really busy at that time and couldn't follow along like I had wanted to do.
>
>I certainly didn't mean to be critical of the folks that were involved in that project. I was on the list too, but my capacity was a GLKFOG (General Lurker, Kibbitzer and Friend Of Gonzo< g >).

WOW! You actually admit to being a friend of Gonzo?? (gdr)


>You guys were trying to make a positive contribution to the community. That's what it's about, isn't it?
>
>Personally, I'd like to see some involvement of VFP in the MS case studies. If only for the purpose of providing an example of the implementation of a multi-language, n-tier design. Further, I think that such a study would have value regardless of the language the reader was using.

I agree.