I take that back... if you use the set skip command to set skip to the child then moving the parent would move the child as well. There may be other implications in doing this though. I couldn't say not knowing your exact situation or what you're trying to accomplish here.

>I don't think you can Mike, but if the problem is not knowing the name of the child, you can use the target() function to determine that/them.
>
>>Can you reposition the child table of a relationship after doing a replace on a foriegn key in the parent table without SKIPping, SEEKing, or GOing?
>>
>>This is part of a resuable class, so all I know is that the parent table is the currently selected.