Hello,
I was just going through some code in a FP2.6 program, and saw following code:
REPLACE ALL MyField WITH NewValue FOR ThisField=ThatValue
I know that the ALL is not necessary here, because the FOR will do the job already (to replace all).
But my question is:
Is the above code much slower than it would be without the ALL, or does FoxPro just not worry about the ALL.
maybe someone knows the answer.
Thank you for help.
Christian Isberner
Software Consultant