>Al,
>
>>I haven't read the entire thread, so I don't know if this idea has come up or not. I feel that, ultimately, a properly designed naming convention will improve the performance and capabilities of automated code analysis tools and/or code generators.
>
>Well, I think most of us FEEL this way, but when i'm trying to rationalize, I can get any clues of proof that it works this way. I suspect that we are blinded because of the past we carry along. I don't say that naming conventions never was a Good idea, but in the world of OOP, NON strict typed languages and the ability to use long variable names, it seems to have lost it's added value.
>
>AS stated in the original message, I still have doubts myself, any example of good use of naming conventions is welcome to build my opinion.
>
>Walter,

I believe that adding structure adds value. Any naming convention would therefore be better than none. As for any "best" convention, that would be a compromise between what would be good for computers to analyze and what would be easy for humans to read.