Walter Meester
HoogkarspelNetherlands
First, Walter, there is no need at all for "sorry" in discussions like this. I know for example that I am often unclear and imprecise in my writing. We can only continue to discuss until we all understand each other's points.
>Jim,
>
>I think we *do* share the same thinking.
>
>All I tried to explain is that with an "Implicit release" meaning when a variable goes out of scope, not using the RELEASE command, the behaviour should stay the same as it is now. Hereby I refer to the oForm example.
>
>With a RELEASE command I still doubt, but have no strong objection to let the object release under any circumstances (althoug i think it maybe nice if you could tell VFP that you only want to release the variable, not the object).
>
I would not objct at all if, in their adoption of this, the VFP Team did as you suggest and permit a way to release a memvar without releaseing the referenced object. As long as we could also definitely release the object when we say so.
>The release method, should alway's release the object.
>
>Sorry if I was not clear enough in the previous messages.
>
>Walter,
Agreeably (I hope),
Jim
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only