In the latest and greatest Windows Sources magazine is an article on Microsoft's Visual Studio 97. Hey, they had the guts to print a section on Visual FoxPro 5.0! However, if you go and read that section, I believe that you'll find inaccuracies and in general that the reviewer is just plain missing the point of VFP.

For those of you who don't subscribe (probably most everybody), you don't have to rush out to buy a copy to see what is in print. Just go to the following URL:

http://www.zdnet.com/wsources/content/current/rsub6.html

I am going to comment directly to that mag about how I feel about the article in a constructive a manner as is possible for me. I invite all of you who give a rip to do the same.