Mike-

As with most words there are narrow definitions and general (or casual) definitions. Since the definition I quoted came from the Dictionary of Object Technology, and since this category is Object Oriented Programming...uh, it was an object definition. *bg*

You might have noticed my first post was quite a bit more general.

>Does anyone else think this is limiting to wrappers? Why couldn't procedural code "wrap" other procedural code? Or a PRG wrap an object, or an object wrap and object. Maybe the definition should be about "wrapper classes" or "wrapper objects". Or are wrappers only: Objects around Non-Objects?