>Wim,
>
>>Hmm, Craig, do you (or anyone) have some independend articles on the same subject? The MS statement is kind of "simple"
>>
>Independ artiles about long term support for VFP? IMO MS is the only source that *can* (but of course will not.. as for every development tool) give you this.
>
>Like you would suspect the technical support will be here on the UT even *IF* MS will stop supporting VFP within a few years.
>
>Let me ask a question: Why do you want to know this ? The future of VFP is just as sure as any other (MS) development tool (maybe except for visual C++). VFP 7 is scheduled for late next year.
>
>IMO there is no need to fear for the VFP future. There are simply too many VFP developers (and applications) around.
>
>Walter,

I want to know this becourse management here wants those reports for evaluation of the current softwaretool.

I do disagree with the future of VFP beeing the same as other products. Look at Visual Basic. It's all around us. C++ is a core product. I Don't see much about VFP in the news.

Also saying there are to many developers is not a good reason imho. Java has a LOT of developers. And where is MS J++ ????

I do agree that the product is a part of visual studio and is THE tool for me and the company. Only those F*.. managers should need that knowledge.

KR,