>>Where is your evidence that it can be done as easily as you say.

Craig, you really need to learn how to debate, and not get emotional about it....

Once again, here is my thesis paraphrased:

If MS made Fox 2.x OOP, and if COBOL can have OOP, VB could get OOP as well...

All I am saying is that IT CAN BE DONE.... With regard to how easy the job would be, I don't know. If you are going to refute that statement, then you are taking the position that it can't be done. If that is not what you are saying, then you don't know the question you are refutting... Primary rule, know what it is you are arguing against...

>>If you don't know, then how can rewriting the kernal be a red-herring?

Because rewriting the kernel is something YOU trotted out. It was never part of my argument. In fact, whether it can/cannot be done has nothing to do with re-writing the kernel. If it does, so be the case.... It still does not have bearing on whether it can/cannot be done.

And BTW, it is KERNEL, not KERNAL. I keep correcting this.....