>>>Correct me if I am wrong, transactions has been around since fox2.x and at that time no such thing as buffering feature. If there is, then there could be a different implementation in VFP.
>>
>>Transactions were totally new to VFP 3.0.
>
>Do you want to say that if buffering=1, then transactions are prohibited? Should VFP raise some error in this case?

If I recall the docs correctly, yes that is what I am saying. Of course looking just now I could not find any reference that asys that, it does say that the atbles must be in a database though.