>>Nobody will argue these points, but the focus of discussion was shifted tremendously (or purposedly). The point was that in some situations XBase approach provides better performance, nothing more and nothing else. If some approach happened to be called 'XBASE' it does not mean yet, that it's bad.
>
>Ed,
>
>You are mistaken here. This thread started with Walter proposing a new capability in VFP that allowed SQL statements to be actually accomplished by VFP as xBase stuff under the hood. No one has changed the subject on this thread at all. I think perhaps you are recalling a different thread that is still going on about performance between SQL select commands and xBase syntax.

It might be so. Actually, as I guessed these threads were parts of the same discussion.