>>>There are a number of MVPs that I know of whose accuracy is questionable at best, but their volume is extremely high.
>
>Yes, I know this is a dick move....but I was wondering if you would care to enlighten us as to who these people are....??????

John,

I don't see it as my responsibility or right to list names of people I find with questionable credentials based on their responses. An intelligent person will be able to determine that by watching my messages and replies. I try to be quite clear when I simply disagree with another idea and when I think the idea is totally off-the-wall having no merit or value at all. If one sees my "off-the-wall" replies often to the same person, then you can pretty well tell that I watch their posts to try to make sure that novices don't get mislead by their BS.

If someone is totally bogus and is adamant about remaining bogus, that's their problem not mine. I don't feel a need to "bring them into the fold" at all. I do feel a need to prevent their BS from confusing others. So, when I respond to a totally bogus suggestion it is to correct the suggestion not the person who made it. The person who made the suggestion may or may not learn form the experience, I don't really care. The people looking on are the ones I am interested in. I want them to get the correct information and not be mislead.