Well said.... I agree entirely.....

>>>>There are a number of MVPs that I know of whose accuracy is questionable at best, but their volume is extremely high.
>>
>>Yes, I know this is a dick move....but I was wondering if you would care to enlighten us as to who these people are....??????
>
>John,
>
>I don't see it as my responsibility or right to list names of people I find with questionable credentials based on their responses. An intelligent person will be able to determine that by watching my messages and replies. I try to be quite clear when I simply disagree with another idea and when I think the idea is totally off-the-wall having no merit or value at all. If one sees my "off-the-wall" replies often to the same person, then you can pretty well tell that I watch their posts to try to make sure that novices don't get mislead by their BS.
>
>If someone is totally bogus and is adamant about remaining bogus, that's their problem not mine. I don't feel a need to "bring them into the fold" at all. I do feel a need to prevent their BS from confusing others. So, when I respond to a totally bogus suggestion it is to correct the suggestion not the person who made it. The person who made the suggestion may or may not learn form the experience, I don't really care. The people looking on are the ones I am interested in. I want them to get the correct information and not be mislead.