>I see your point. Further, I think we're in agreement here on what's
>happening. However, my point wasn't whether or not this works, but whether or
>not the documentation coincides with that behavior. Clearly, it states that
>memory variables should be surrounded with quotation marks. Further, it goes
>on to say that if you don't "U" is returned. That fact that in your example
>above not doing so returns "N" contradicts the docs.
>
>Personally, I think that this should be passed on to the documentation team. I
>would hope that you'd be in agreement.

Ok, you got me on that one. Will do. :-)