>Cetin,
>
>Transactions new new in VFP 3.0. The PLB you refer to used transactions of Novel, FP 2.x could also use ODBC to access data in other databses that had transactions but VFP transactions were new to VFP 3.0.
>
>As for teh buffering thing, I long ago posted aretraction to that statement. Yes it is possible to use a transaction on an unbuffered table but it sertainly makes no sense to do that.

I would not agree here. If some tables, even unbuffered, must be changed safely i.e. either all or nothing, then transaction looks very appropriate. I mean that we have some 'buffer', e.g. cursor(s) on local workstation that hold changes for these tables and we want to move these changes to real data (file-server).