>>MVP is not a lordship or a title deserving of some special consideration nor is it a mark of class distinction. It doesn't even mean you know any more than anyone else about anything.
>
>In a sense, nobody would argue with your opinion here. But MVP's to a certain extent answers questions even more accurate than majority of NON-MVP's because they have to protect their status.

Jess, remarks like this are more likely to make me stop frequenting UT than the PUTM charge (which I've already paid, as opposed to your unwillingness to invest in UT, either as a tool, or as a VFP community venture), and ignore input and issues from you regardless of the venue.

MVPs don't have to protect their status. The award is given for past performance, not a promise of future performance. Unlike many who spout nonsense on this site, MVPs tend to be accurate because they can be, and their expertise is well-established by what they've already said and done. The clueless tend to feel a need to speak up in utter absense of knowledge, in an attempt to provide themselves with an aura of authority.