>Jess, remarks like this are more likely to make me stop frequenting UT than the PUTM charge (which I've already paid, as opposed to your unwillingness to invest in UT, either as a tool, or as a VFP community venture), and ignore input and issues from you regardless of the venue.

Maybe I used the wrong term but sorry for that. In heart, MVPs are valuable to UT community.

Excuse me, actually our company is willing to pay 3 membership but as Michel was frequently answering us that they do not have other payment mode other than 'CARD' which we do not like because of frequent erroneous billing. We prefer electronic fund transfer. Michel knows that even when I was still new to UT we are willing to invest because of lots of benefits. 120US$ X 3 is just an equivalent of 50% of one Payroll System that we sell.

>
>MVPs don't have to protect their status. The award is given for past performance, not a promise of future performance. Unlike many who spout nonsense on this site, MVPs tend to be accurate because they can be, and their expertise is well-established by what they've already said and done. The clueless tend to feel a need to speak up in utter absense of knowledge, in an attempt to provide themselves with an aura of authority.

But you have to stay accurate and valuable to stay on that level. That's why MVP status is just but temporary thing. Today you may be accurate but tomorrow, that I don't know of, because nothing is permanent...