>Peter,
>
>First of all I'd suggest taking this private or offline. Unless you can cite in your letter where you asserted that FoxPro would be an effective missle shield. *bg*

Hmmm... Perhaps a major rewrite for JFast??

I didn't mean to start a NMD debate here. As you said, I was just excited about being published in a national newspaper and wanted to share that.

>You don't know whether or not John would listen to you. By asserting that you are talking past him and that doesn't add to communications. It also is a moral judgement about John and I doubt you meant that. It also comes across as condescending and I also don't think you meant that either.

You're right. Notice my second response to John. At any rate, I'll carry on any further debate offline.

Peter