Who exactly are you refering to?

>Christof...
>
>I was talking about the roles of the managing and technical editors, of which you are not one.
>
>As far as I understand, the role of the contributing editor is more symbolic than anything. i.e., you don't really "edit" anything. It is the role of the managing/techincal editors that chart the editorial direction of the magazine...
>
>Now, if you were to be a technical editor of FPA, I would see that as a good thing....
>
>So you see, my issue is not with you personally.....
>
>Kind of narrows it down...doesn't it....
>
>
>
>>Hi John,
>>
>>>Look at the pathetic posts up here by the editorial regime and you begin to see what I mean.
>>
>>Which of my posts do you mean?
>>
>>>About the only thing the editorial board of FPA knows about WSH, COM, and ADO is how to spell the acronyms.
>>
>>Well, I never pretended to know much about ADO, because my work is less data-centered than those of most folks here, but I do know more about COM than just how to spell the acronym, that's fer sure.
>>
>>Christof
>>Advisor Contributing Editor