>
Are you telling me that you cannot see for yourself where you are insulting people ?
>
You are the one leveling the charge. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to provide some relevant examples...


>
Well do you want the refference to all the messages where you did apply name-calling. It could be a fairly long list.
>
Yes, please find a message where I called somebody and A-Hole or a jerk...

>
As a non-native english spoken person, I don't have a clue to what you're referring to.
>

Now you are a non-native English speaking person. Sorry Walter, but this is like invoking the 5th... Amendment which protects you from self-incrimination. It is an all or nothing propositon. You either answer the questions or you don't. You cannot selectively answer some questions and not answer other questions. In the same vein, you cannot invoke your non-english speaking status when it suits you. You seem to converse fairly well in English.


>
I've never insulted people here who didn't attack me with name-calling. This is one thing that doesn't apply to both you and mr Rauh. The only reason for applying name-calling because you applied systematical rudeness to fellow UT-ers including myself. If it wasn't for my allergic reaction to rudeness, we'd probably could get along nicely.
>

Well, if memory serves, I never conversed with you in this thread. Therefore, I would say you poked your head somewhere it did not belong. Please don't be the self-procaimed defender of the "fellow UT'ers" It is not a role that suits you. Further, it is a role that nobody asked you to assume...



>
Well luckely i'm not the only one who did say this in the past. I could come up with numerous persons which had conflicts with your attitude for the same reasons. In that way, I think you're wrong.
>

The past, the past, the past... Will you please get away from the past.... Again, you stuck your nose where it did not belong. Next time, be sure to mind your own business. Unless of course, you have something of value to contribute. If your only goal is to attack me, attack my point of view, then I would suggest it would be better for you to stay silent. If you would like to debate me on the merits of FPA, then lets do so. If all you want to do is take pot-shots, then stay silent. Staying silent is a role that serves you well...


>
Sadly I think this thing is a solid part of your attitude of which you cannot change much for yourself. I'll guess you'll have to live with it and accept the consequences. Seeing the trouble you've made here on the UT in the last 6 months I'll guess life isn't easy for you.
>

What trouble? Things look pretty good to me. Care to enumerate what trouble I have made????? As for life, it is VERY good...

As always, thank you for your concern...