John,

>Are you telling me that you cannot see for yourself where you are insulting people ?
>>
>You are the one leveling the charge. Therefore, the burden of proof is on you to provide some relevant examples...

Here it goes:

>Weasel.....gutless turd...balls...wimp ...pathetic, myopic view ... pisses you the hell off ... I don't give a shit ... F-ing evil sysop. .... rankle my ass
>spineless little turd, you would also be a hypocritical little bastard
...backdoor crap is plan bull-shit.

to michel
>Personally, I think you two are a couple of hypocrits for the stance you are taking.

After Win98, What?
>Win 98 accross the board is a piece of shit.... It is slower than a tick on a dog's ass.... Now that is pretty slow... SQL Server on 98 is terrible.... It ain't just a VFP thing...

The Ten Commandments for UTers!
>If he/she does'nt like my attitude, though shit

How about all VFP client/server?
>I wonder if those DOJ ass-wipes ever took that into account....<s>

to Gregg Geeslin
>What, the words Ass and Whore offend you???

To nick,
My 2-cents perf. and sticking the PUTM with the bill.....
>As far as I am concerned, you can take your comments and stick them up your ass sideways. They don't apply whatsoever....

By no means tried to get a complete lists.
And how about the ed, pikeman affair ? I haven't seen him arround lately.

Among myself you've attacked, Ed Pikeman, Evan Delay, John K, Michel Fournier, Jim Nelson, Nick N in a very rude way. I'm sure there are a whole lot of others which I forgot to mention.

Besides this insulting attitude you've got problems to stick to promises:

Test
>And this... really is my last post on the Universal Thread


>Well do you want the refference to all the messages where you did apply name-calling. It could be a fairly long list.
>>
>Yes, please find a message where I called somebody and A-Hole or a jerk...

See above, you'll find some abusement of the word 'ass'. Besides this the word 'shit' seems to be a rather popular word in your vocubulary. But i've got to agree that in general you try to insult people in other ways (unlike EdR).

>As a non-native english spoken person, I don't have a clue to what you're referring to.

>Now you are a non-native English speaking person. Sorry Walter, but this is like invoking the 5th... Amendment which protects you from self-incrimination. It is an all or nothing propositon. You either answer the questions or you don't. You cannot selectively answer some questions and not answer other questions. In the same vein, you cannot invoke your non-english speaking status when it suits you. You seem to converse fairly well in English.

In that case refrase the question !

>I've never insulted people here who didn't attack me with name-calling. This is one thing that doesn't apply to both you and mr Rauh. The only reason for applying name-calling because you applied systematical rudeness to fellow UT-ers including myself. If it wasn't for my allergic reaction to rudeness, we'd probably could get along nicely.

>Well, if memory serves, I never conversed with you in this thread. Therefore, I would say you poked your head somewhere it did not belong. Please don't be the self-procaimed defender of the "fellow UT'ers" It is not a role that suits you. Further, it is a role that nobody asked you to assume...

It's a free country (both the US as The Netherlands), so I can take up every role I like as long as it fits the UT guidelines (hmmm. another topic !!). As I said before to John K, I play a different role here on the UT, I like to question everything that comes along. If you don't like it: bad luck.

>>Well luckely i'm not the only one who did say this in the past. I could come up with numerous persons which had conflicts with your attitude for the same reasons. In that way, I think you're wrong.

>The past, the past, the past... Will you please get away from the past.... Again, you stuck your nose where it did not belong. Next time, be sure to mind your own business.

Well, to me it seems that the past is repeating itself when it comes to your behaviour up here, so the past is an excellent forecast.

>Unless of course, you have something of value to contribute.

See my runtime command window in the files section. Since you don't use the VFP engine I would be useless to refer to our conversation about the DELETED() tag. It's just a shame, because the logic behind the reasoning also applies to SQL -server or any other (R)DBMS.

>If your only goal is to attack me, attack my point of view, then I would suggest it would be better for you to stay silent.

I've tried with: A. a discussion about client/server vs Xbase and B the VB thread. Since we both now the outcome, I'll gues you've got an invalid point.

>If you would like to debate me on the merits of FPA, then lets do so. If all you want to do is take pot-shots, then stay silent.

I don't want to debate you about the merits of FPA, but about human communications. Again, nobody has the right to order me to stay silent, not even JVP.

>Staying silent is a role that serves you well...

Don't we all ??

>Sadly I think this thing is a solid part of your attitude of which you cannot change much for yourself. I'll guess you'll have to live with it and accept the consequences. Seeing the trouble you've made here on the UT in the last 6 months I'll guess life isn't easy for you.
>
>What trouble? Things look pretty good to me. Care to enumerate what trouble I have made????? As for life, it is VERY good...

Ask Ed Pikeman, Evan Delay, John K, Michel Fournier, Jim Nelson, Nick N to name a few.

>As always, thank you for your concern...

You're welcome.

Walter,