Karl,

>You indicated you weren't aware of the specific reason and relevent message, so I obliged. The origin wasn't in question, afaik, but apparently the reference answered your other questions?

I had a message all typed and chunked it because it's irrelevant now that I see the posting from Michel.

My point in posting to Nancy in the first place last night was to point out that when something link this happens, everyone should be able to know which message went over what rule of conduct. Assumptions in cases like these are usually bad things.

I'm glad all this seems to be taken care of now.