>>Nope. Without us, "they" would be dead. The least an adminstration and users could do is work out an agreement together, then have the users abide contently by their own rules.
>
>How do you propose that that be done without filling the UT with hundreds of messages debating various words back and forth? Organize a campaign to get people to email Michel or a designated sysop? Form a committee? Or just let them know your concerns as an individual?
Thus the futility of setting indefensible *rules*.
Self-policing really works much better, IME and NSHO.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only