My point is the fact that much of Miriam's article is technically inaccurate, does not go into sufficient detail, etc.... I thought my comments were pretty self-explanatory..
>John, I've read this twice and don't understand your point. :)
>
>Maybe a better question would be does anyone really read FPA for
>technical merit?
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement