> >If there is no such way, does anyone know of a workaround, besides
> defining the properties before loading the class?
>
> Personally, I prefer to have class property-array as a place to store
> undetermined number of 'properties' (array is resizeble, isn't it?).
Yes, but that's exactly the reason we use properties instead of arrays -
array members are accessed by index number, and properties by name. I
have had a similar question for adding methods to a form
programmatically (from, say, a builder or a conversion routine), and
have written to m$.foxwish (or whatever the name was), and got nothing
back, unless a serial form message is something.
I think the whole idea was to have properties (pre)designed, and that
adding properties at runtime could lead to... er, unpredictable results.
Besides, checking every time if a property exists is a kind of
toothache.
See I've been a nice boy and didn't ask you what do you need it for :)