Exactly, that is why the code should have been posted in the first place as opposed to sending the guy off to some website to buy some book. Based on the table of contents, it does not appear that the book goes into that much detail on Outlook anyway. In fact, folks could probably get more indepth material for free from my website....




>Hey John,
>
>To you and me it's not rocket science, but I suppose Rich might have another opinion. To get anything done with Outlook or Office, you have to play around a lot because it's not intuitive right away....and the docs suck. I mean, look at GetNameSpace("MAPI")....a lot of people look at that and quite reasonably say "wtf??"
>
>>That is a good point.. There are a lot of FREE resources out there on how to do this. You know, it ain't rocket science... < bg >.
>
>>Regardless, to hawk one's book at the expense of providing the required tech support is lame. In other words, if you are going to take the time to respond to somebody's post, you then are are obligated to either answer the question or point that person in the correct direction. If you do answer the question, then by all means, let the person know of your resource.
>
>I understand your general feud with FPA and Tamar, but I don't think she posted badly. Maybe a bit lacking in details but....?