Did I?
What I was trying to say was MS didn't fit the textbook definition of a monopoly. I wasn't saying they didn't enjoy a competitive advantage over other software vendors. Competitive advantage does not constitute a monopoly.
Its hard to say if consumers would be better off with more competition because MS products are widely available and competively priced. That fact is not characteristic of a monopoly.
Charlie
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement