>Craig,
>
>Thanks for your reply.
>
>We need to access data on a server over the telophone lines. This is the bottom line and the main reason to go C/S. I do not see how you can still remain in VFP in these circumstances.
>
>Marc
>
>
>>Before you get to which is best, you should answer "Why does your client want C/S?" Cause it's the latest buzzword? Cause they heard it's faster? Remote access to data? Security? Could be that VFP will work just fine them.
>>
>>Craig


You can! Depending on the amount of data, you can run your Fox applications as is. You could also build your own Fox Server, a process that sits on the back end, accepts requests, processes them, and returns only the result set. Sound familiar?? Yup...it's C/S.

Craig