>>>>BTW, did SP4 fix this bug?
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>>Ok, thanks. May be VFP7.0 will fix it, if it's possible to fix.
>
>It's not technically a problem with TRANSFORM() as much as it is with the handling of the math internals.
>
>>BTW, did you notice the message, I cc to you about RUN command. I sent it to you, because you're a friend on Ed Rauh, so perhaps these two my notes should be incorporated in his class (and program), if they are not here yet. Don't know, if repeated delcaration of functions is dangerous, but as a precaution I would clean after myself...
>>
>I don't believe (and I think this has been discussed before) that there should be any concern about re-declaring a DLL. David Frankenbach, I think, did some tests in this area (if it was someone else, my apologies for not recalling). In fact, given that there's currently no way to test whether or not a particular one has been declared and that the only way to release one is to release them all, it's better to err on the side of caution than to be concerned about the impact on memory consumption.

Ok, that's good if it's true. I also have to find the Cetin's thread about it...
Besides, I already incorporated John (?) suggestion in my local version. I'm not only lazy, I'm sometimes overprotective :))