Mr. McCasland,

>Whoa there podner! The point is for members to make a concious, not mindless, decision on who to forward a reply to.

My original point deals with the issue of this... how do you KNOW that someone is being mindless. At that point you are judgeing motives and that is something (as I noted that Mr. Rauh correctly mentioned) you just can not do.

>Ever heard of incrementalism? Even 1 grain of sand is an irritant to an oyster.

Perhaps, but with the oyster it takes the irritant and turns it into soemthing wonderful. At the UT it is turned into twitting and garbage collection.

>Everyone has their own limits and threshholds.

Agreed! If the problem is really that bad then it certianly needs to be addressed.

>Your skin was too thin on this one especially with your feelings of being an outsider here.

Perhaps, but perhaps I have knowledge of things you do not!

>AFAIC, there are no outsiders here. Lurkers maybe, but no outsiders. :)

You certianly have the right to that opinion but it comes from someone that is inside and I really do not want this to come across as offensive to you Mark but I think that you have your head in the sand as it pertains to this statement. Again, please... I am not wanting to be offensive to you.

>Please also note that I did check all the Forward a Copy to boxes because of the nature of my reply to you regarding your last response to Nigel.

Well I am sure that it was a concious decision and that all will recognize it as such.

Please note that I did NOT forward any of my messages to anyone!