Hi Eddie,

I had only seen less than a handful of insults from you over the last 2 or so months and *none* of them directed at me until now. I really thought that you had found a better way to express yourself, but yet again I was wrong.

I saw not a shred of "vehemence" in my reply to ***Rod P.*** (not to JVP and not to you). I never claimed *anything* about copyright laws or anything related to it because I *know* that I am less than knowledgeable on the subject.

I feel adequately INFORMED on the issue that I see here. Pinnacle *may* have been at fault but certainly not Grigore.

Anyway, I see that people really don't change, despite appearances to the contrary. Even to the point that you continue to be unable to insult me DIRECTLY.

Jim N


SNIP
>
>Regarding statements made by less than knowledgable individuals, they probably aren't worth the cost of transmitting their ASCII presenting their uninformed and pointless positions.
>
>Good luck reaching an equitable and acceptable resolution regarding your valued published works. Your decision to study the law will offer you insights that most of us have little detailed understanding, although the uniformed may shoot off their mouths, their uninformed vehemence should be ignore and certainily discarded as basic drivel.
>
>Ed