Thanks Steve.

I had some problems with string.dbf clashing in Codebook and INTL and unfortunately had a hard day just trying to sort it out. Though when once sorted things were too smooth. I respect your efforts for the toolkit and they have helped everybody to get things in a better way.

If I come accross any suggesstion I shall forward them.
Thanks again,
Kamal

>Thanks for the compliment <s>.
>
> The STRINGS.DBF in Codebook was originally meant to be a compatibility point, not an incopatibility. What I've done here is replace the codebook STRINGS.DBF with the one in INTL, and re-wire Codebook's GetString() function to call INTL's I() function instead....
>
>I'm working on the next release of INTL, by the way, for release next year some time. If you have any compelling suggestions for the next version, I'd love to hear them.
>
>**--** Steve
>
>>
>>Brilliant is the word you are looking for... as long as you dont have a table called strings.dbf. :-)
>>
>>It uses a table called strings.dbf and I had to spend a day on it as the framework I was using also had a strings.dbf. I think it is an exceptional piece of work and it does the job fast.
>>
>>Have a nice day,
>>Kamal