>
I think you should be carefull of what you say here john, If you want to be a reliable source, don't throw this kind of statements.
>

I am as reliable as it gets. If I am not 100% accurate, I am 99.999% accruate. You should know by know that when I write something, it is done very matter of factly.

The fact is, MS is stressing that VS.Net will be THE way to build n-tier and web-enabled apps. VFP is not going to be part of .Net. Therefore, by using simple logic, VFP is not considered by MS to be the optimal tool for n-tier/web enabled apps.



>We'll have to see and wait *IF* the whole .NET thing is taking us forward or we walk the dinasour again (as we did many times in the past).
>

That is a matter of interpretation. You have changed how the word 'forward' is being used. The fact is, .Net is where MS is going. And further, VFP is not part of it..