>In your presentation last night, somebody brought up the issue about dealing with 1 to many relationship and how you return that data. You mentioned using a hierarchical (shaped) recordset.

Wrong. I brought up Shapes, and then explained them, privately, to Barbara to avoid disrupting the flow. I was there, primarily, because I knew you'd sneak in, find a way to be disruptive and/or look for ammunition to be a turd here on the main board. And I can see I wasn't wrong.

>My question to you is how much experience do you have in working with heirarchical recordsets? In my experience, they are OK for presentation. However, the same issue arises when you try to update through the recordset. It simply is not reliable. This gets to the question.

What does that matter? This was an intro.

Your problem, John, is that you are a classless coward. You find ways to insinuate things and then cry like a baby when people call you on it. You manage to piss off far more people than you enlighten. You want to challenge people all the time and then back off when they take you up on it, claiming that you were misunderstood.

There are a few people who yet buy into your BS, but I'm sure they will soon be enlightened.

Craig tries hard to help people, and is a stand-up guy. The lectures are a volunteer effort. This was an intro, and --- as a fulltime attendee to the session which you were NOT -- I could see some people got a lot out of it.