>
>Yes, I'm sure that anyone can sit down and find a way to make NT look better than linux. That's what MS is trying to do everyday. One of their points being that linux isn't certified to be ran by government operations. Did you see the latest security analysis on the gov't? They got a D-.
>

Is a D good or bad?

>It's funny how you just dismissed everything that Jerry just posted in light of still believing that Bill rules. Bill is a good businessman, but that is where it stops.

I don't believe that UCITA applies to the argument, as much as you want it to. Jerry brought up that point, but that is hardly a thing that stops people from benchmarking MS software in this day and age. If you can believe some "pundit" magazines (infoworld, internetweek, etc.), UCITA has been passed in two or three states only.

And when did I mention Bill? You keep bringing that out. You would sound more objective when you stop your obsession with MS & Bill.