>I'm not claiming that you are wrong...

You said "... but ingnored.... I don't think so.... " So are we clearing up that you did not mean that?

>In doing so I was trying to illustrate a point that ranting about a problem without offering an alternative does not accomplish anything.

I'm not going to say, who was ranting, and who wasn't, but Jason has been offering solutions too.

>My suggestion was to have the presenter "present" in a doc format.... allow those interested to read and absorb the material and formulate questions.... then follow that up with a chat session so the presenter can answer the questions.

This is digressing... but are you saying that "email me if you have a question" or "chat with me if you have a question" are "pretty different"?

>at this point at least, he is not doing it.... at least on the UT forum.

But he does in teh IRC room... which happens to be what this is about.

>.... did nothing to suggest alternatives.

He'd at least like response about whats wrong with his primary suggesions

>.... attacked people personally.

You mean Proffesionally, he even cleared that up for you.

>.... was abusive in tone and nature and
>.... showed a lack of appreciation for what is basically a free service to him.

Subjective stuff... not gonna touch it.

In any case, it shoudl be clear that I agree with Jason, and was hoping somethign would be done right after they realized there was a problem.