Hi again Mike....

>>I'm not claiming that you are wrong...

>>You said "... but ingnored.... I don't think so.... " So are we clearing up >>that you did not mean that?

It was a joke Mike.... read after the line... it was a take off on JVP!!!

So If I was going to be like JVP I would say this....

So show me the word "wrong" I simply said that I don't think so... I expressed my opinion.

Lighten up friend... I really was not placing blame. If it came across that way I'm sorry and seek forgiveness.

>>I'm not going to say, who was ranting, and who wasn't, but Jason has been >>offering solutions too.

I'm sure you are correct.

>>This is digressing... but are you saying that "email me if you have a >>question" or "chat with me if you have a question" are "pretty different"?

No.. what I'm saying is that presenting a doc with the sole purpose of teaching and geared to a follow up chat to answer questions and clarify the material IS differnt. It was just a suggestion that obviously missed the mark.

>>But he does in teh IRC room... which happens to be what this is about.

Again, Im sure you are correct. But HE brought it out to the UT and attempts to take people away. That is his doing... not mine. If he chooses to stay in the IRC that is fine but he sould then make his arguments there.

>>He'd at least like response about whats wrong with his primary suggesions

How do you know that he did not get a response? In fact he did get a detailed response from me in private. I moved it there becasue I had some things to say that were best left off the forum.

>>You mean Proffesionally, he even cleared that up for you.

Did he really?

>>In any case, it shoudl be clear that I agree with Jason, and was hoping >>somethign would be done right after they realized there was a problem.

Great! I also hope that the problems are cleared up for everyones benefit. < s >