>Geo,
>
>>I'm not so sure that Wiki's the best place. My concern is that the message sent might be less than clear.
>
>The discussion part of it might work, but the voting part is probably premature and perhaps not needed. I like the wiki for this, because the ongoing "discussion" in wiki format usually results in a document that distills and summarizes the otherwise rambling and scattered nature of forum threads. IOW, it's easier to get a sense of the community's views by reading a mature wiki document that wading through hundreds of thread messages, which usually tend to wander and drift.

I think the discussion part would work. The problem is distilling it into precisely what the consensus of the community is.

>>It occurs to me, however, that this whole thing might be premature on my part. I think what has to happen first is for us to hear exactly what will be required on the part of the Foxteam to implement CLR or perhaps Windows CE. IOW, exactly what we'd have to give up. That's my take.
>
>I'll try to follow up with Robert and Ricardo over the next couple of weeks to work out a way to facilitate the "dialog with the community" that they discussed with me.

That would be great, Dave, especially if they're (and Randy too) willing and able to provide us with feedback.